|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Ethical codes, professional and legal standards
..Download Full Class Notes File.. 9/15/03 Chapter 1 Sources of quality and control in school psychology Definitions: Ethics: Principals that govern how people behave as professionals. Four broad ethical principals: On way to insure that school psychologists as a field are sticking to these principles is peer monitoring. Be aware of what you and others are doing. How do you know if an act or decision is ethical. Eight step problem solving model Crisis decision making: The most common ethical problems reported to NASP about school psychologists. Chapter 2 The US Constitution governs everything we do. The statutes enacted by the congress, state, local govern, and boards of education are subject to the Constitution. In the Constitution, there is no fundamental right for everyone to have an education. It does say that everyone has the right to an equal educational opportunity. It governs students’ rights in the school setting, and it governs church-state-school relationships. The amendments: in the 10th adm. Sate governments were given the duty to educate. State governments were also given the power to tax citizens of the state to finance education, and state governments were given the power to compel student attendance. Most states have further delegated these responsibilities to boards of education. (thus boards of edu. are arms of the federal gov.) In the 14th amendment, courts can not and do not intervene in the resolution of conflicts in schools which do not have to do with constitutional values. Two clauses involved in many court cases: Equal protection clause: PRAXIS!! Brown verses the Board of Education. Determined that the assignment of African-American children to separate and inferior schools is a denial of equal protection under the 14th amendment. Pennsylvania Association of Retarded Children vs. commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Mills vs. the Board of Education. Ruled that exclusion of children with handicaps is a denial of equal protection under the 14th amendment. Due process clause: Substantive due process: A state can not pass a law that deprives citizens of life, liberty, or property – education is a property right. So school rules restricting student rights must be related to the school’s purpose. Procedural due process: the state can’t take away life, liberty or property without some sort of procedural fairness. Goss vs. Lopez – schools can’t expend or expel children from school without impartial due process procedures. – not more than ten days if they have a special education label without going through the proper procedures. The proper procedures have been a manifestation determination hearing procedure. If it is found that the behaviour is not related to the disability, then the student is disciplined just like any other. But if it is related to a disability, then an intervention plan is developed, not punishment. 1st and 4th amendment: Students have the freedom of speech rights as long as it doesn’t interrupt the functioning of the school (Ex. Obscene language, ten commandments, dressing, gang signals.) Privacy rights: courts have not recognized that students have privacy in schools at the same levels that adults have privacy. (Ex. Search and seizure under reasonable suspicion vs. probable cause in adults. Freedom of religion: congress and the states are prohibited from passing laws respecting an establishment of religion. Statutes and Regulations. Congress is forbidden from creating a nationalized school system. But congress can offer money to states to comply with federal mandates. (instead of using the stick, they use the carrot) Anti-discrimination legislation: Civil Rights Act of 1871: any person whose constitutional rights have been violated can sue the official who violated or the agency he works for. Federal Education Legislation: Goals 2000 - Educate America Act (1994) – provides a framework for national reform, which developed 8 national goals and the funds were made available to support school improvement consistent with those goals. School to Work Opportunity Act of 1994 – provides monies to help better prepare students for employment or post-secondary education. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) - prior to 1990, called “Education of the Handicapped act (EHA)” – Part B: allocates funds to states that provide FAPE (Free and Appropriate Public Education) to all children with disabilities. Part C: Funds states that offer early intervention programs for infants and toddlers. Addresses infants or toddlers with known or suspected disabilities. Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA) – Says that federal funds will be removed from schools if they don’t adhere to the record keeping procedures outlined in the law. – these procedures insure confidentiality and parent access of records. The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (1978) (The Hatch Amendment) (Revised to be the Goals 2000) – says funding will be withheld if schools don’t obtain written parental consent before a student can be required to submit to a survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals certain types of personal information. Case Law (Common Law) – develops over time to fill in for the written law (like a ball of soap pieces): Regulation: The controversy between NASP and APA: It used to be certification was granted by the board of education, and licensure was by the board of psychology – not education is granting licensure (what we will get). Ethical Sanctions and Liability – both APA and NASP support attempts to resolve ethical issues and unlawful conduct issues informally before filing a complaint. There are two categories of Torts (A legal obligation to protect others in society): Educational Malpractice: the courts have ruled on two types of educational malpractice: instructional malpractice -not usually successful - a few cases have gone in favor of those who filed the suits, but the courts felt that the monetary awards would cause damage to the schools. Paul D Coverdell Teacher Protection Act of 2001: Included in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Provides a limitation on liability for school personnel when they take reasonable action to maintain order, discipline, and appropriate educational environment. Filed under: EDC 572 Role & Function of the School PsychologistCopyright: September, 2003 - David Profitt |
|
|