|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Assessment: Individually administered tests of intellectual functioning
K-ABC-II For a sample writeup using the KABC-II, click here SB-5 Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales - 5 Ages 2 to 90+ (May not be as good for younger children)
All test subjects take an initial vocabulary test, which along with the subject's age, determines the number and level of subtests to be administered. Total testing time is 45-90 minutes, depending on the subject's age and the number of subtests given. Raw scores are based on the number of items answered, and are converted into a standard age score corresponding to age group, similar to an IQ measure. WISC-IV Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - IV The WISC-IV has an increased ceiling over the previous version of the test; the test offers additional harder questions at the upper ends of a number of subtests. The WISC-IV has eliminated the Verbal IQ and Performance IQ scores of its predecessors. The 10 required subtests (5 are supplementary) yield a Full Scale IQ score and four Composite scores: Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, and Processing Speed. Note that gifted children who scored 130 on the WISC-III are scoring an average of 124 or the WISC-IV The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) ads several new subtests while other subtests have been eliminated. Instead of a verbal and a performance scale, the WISC-IV has four indices made up of ten core and five supplemental subtests. The indices are: - Verbal comprehension Scores from each index, based on the 10 core subtests only, are combined to create a child's total score, or Full Scale IQ (FSIQ). Dropped from the WISC-IV are these three subtests from earlier editions: - Mazes In their place are working memory and processing speed subtests that researchers discovered are more accurate and better measures of intelligence. New subtests added to the WISC-IV include:
Old: A WISC-III score is derived from the scaled combination of two sets of subtests, verbal and performance. Each set has its own total, derived from the scaled combination of six subtest scores. School districts typically used a discrepancy between the verbal and performance sections as an indicator of a learning disability, although they might not provide special services unless there are additional indicators. The discrepancy formula is not best practice. CTONI (Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence) The CTONI measures nonverbal reasoning abilities of children and adults for whom other tests are biased or inappropriate. No oral responses, reading, writing, or object manipulation are required to take the test. CTONI is useful for testing individuals with difficulties in language or fine motor skills, including those who are motor disabled, or neurologically impaired. The six subtests of the CTONI require students to view a group of pictures or designs and to solve problems involving analogies, categorizations, and sequences. The viewer simply indicates an answer by pointing to alternative choices. For an example ETR using the CTONI for a low functioning student, click here, Filed under: Praxis II StudiesCopyright: May, 2005 - David Profitt |
|
|